Turn AI governance
into operational control.
One control plane across the AI relationships your organisation approves.
SECUVA™ sits between your healthcare environment and the AI services it uses. Your organisation decides which relationships are approved and on what conditions. SECUVA makes those decisions operational at the healthcare-data boundary, keeps patient identity on your side of the relationship where nothing external needs it, and preserves the evidence of what occurred.
Your organisation decides which AI relationships are approved, for what purpose, and on what conditions.
Those decisions become technical controls at the healthcare-data boundary, not commitments attached to a contract.
The controls the relationship requires are applied - including keeping patient identity on your side of it where nothing external needs identity.
Governed activity leaves evidence your organisation holds and can use, in an immutable audit trail - for the Board, for privacy review, for assurance.
Governance stays on your side
of the AI relationship.
Approved AI services receive what your policy permits, at the boundary of your healthcare environment. The control plane that carries the policy and the evidence is independent of any AI vendor, marketplace or application stack - and it is not another place your patient data goes.
The AI provider does not decide what it receives. Your organisation does.
Designed to work with the systems you already run.
Every new AI relationship
enters a model that already exists.
Healthcare organisations do not adopt one AI service. They accumulate an estate - across suppliers, modalities, research partners and internal models - and the governance work is normally rebuilt around each one. SECUVA™ standardises the boundary once, so approved services onboard through a control and evidence model the organisation already owns.
What will change
- AI vendors and suppliers
- Models and model versions
- Marketplaces and app stores
- Cloud and hosting arrangements
- Clinical and imaging platforms
- Purposes, use cases and data domains
What will not
The authority over what AI may receive, and the evidence of every governed release.
Ten approved AI relationships or a hundred: one policy architecture, one evidence model, and no governance rebuilt per integration.
Available now in medical imaging.
Built to extend across the estate.
One policy architecture and one evidence model, with the protection each domain requires applied at the boundary.
Radiology and medical imaging
Imaging is where the identity problem is hardest, and where the governance question arrives first: the studies are valuable to AI, and patient identity is present in more places than an export setting reaches. PixelIQ governs imaging releases to approved AI services and keeps identity on the organisation’s side of the relationship where the authorised purpose does not require it.
Illustrative scenario
A radiology network cannot send studies to an approved AI vendor. Identity sits in places standard export settings do not reach, so legal cannot approve the transfer. With the governance boundary in place, legal has what it needs to approve the release.
The same model, across the estate
The day you switch SECUVA™ on.
Five moments where a governance model is actually tested, answered twice.
A new AI vendor is approved
Without a governance layer
Architecture, privacy, security and integration controls are reconstructed around another data path.
With SECUVA
The approved destination enters a governance boundary and policy model that already exists.
The AI supplier changes its endpoint or its service
Without a governance layer
Contracts and documentation can change before technical enforcement catches up.
With SECUVA
Destination policy stays independently enforced at the boundary.
The Board asks which AI relationships are operating
Without a governance layer
Vendor registers, procurement records, integration diagrams and logs are reconciled by hand.
With SECUVA
Governed relationships and the supporting evidence are available from one control plane.
There is a security incident
Without a governance layer
What may have crossed is reconstructed from application and network logs.
With SECUVA
Transaction-level evidence of governed release activity is already held.
The estate expands from ten algorithms to a hundred
Without a governance layer
Integration complexity falls while the governance surface expands invisibly.
With SECUVA
Each approved relationship stays subject to customer-controlled policy and evidence.
Australian healthcare governance
is the brief, not a localisation.
SECUVA™ was designed around the governance realities Australian healthcare organisations operate under, rather than retrofitted from a US or EU baseline.
Australian-hosted
Policy and governance evidence stay in Australian infrastructure, under the organisation's own control plane.
Australian governance context
Designed around the privacy, records and ethics expectations Australian healthcare organisations actually operate under.
Built in Australia
Engineered here, for the systems, suppliers and governance structures in use here.